Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214029›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Thermodynamic Balance vs. Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach for the Outlet Temperature Estimation of a Benchtop Spray Dryer.

Andrea Milanesi, Francesco Rizzuto, Maurizio Rinaldi, Andrea Foglio Bonda, Lorena Segale, Lorella Giovannelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea MilanesiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-924X
Francesco RizzutoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-5007
Maurizio RinaldiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-1634
Andrea Foglio BondaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-9907
Lorena SegaleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-4339
Lorella GiovannelliDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-341X
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Università del Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro (DSF) FAR 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of design space (DS) is a key milestone in the quality by design (QbD) of pharmaceutical processes. It should be considered from early laboratory development to industrial production, in order to support scientists with making decisions at each step of the product's development life. Presently, there are no available data or methodologies for developing models for the implementation of design space (DS) on laboratory-scale spray dryers. Therefore, in this work, a comparison between two different modeling approaches, thermodynamics and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), to a laboratory spray dryer model have been evaluated. The models computed the outlet temperature (Tout) of the process with a new modeling strategy that includes machine learning to improve the model prediction. The model metrics calculated indicate how the thermodynamic model fits Tout data better than CFD; indeed, the error of the CFD model increases towards higher values of Tout and feed rate (FR), with a final mean absolute error of 10.43 K, compared to the 1.74 K error of the thermodynamic model. Successively, a DS of the studied spray dryer equipment has been implemented, showing how Tout is strongly affected by FR variation, which accounts for about 40 times more than the gas flow rate (Gin) in the DS. The thermodynamic model, combined with the machine learning approach here proposed, could be used as a valid tool in the QbD development of spray-dried pharmaceutical products, starting from their early laboratory stages, replacing traditional trial-and-error methodologies, preventing process errors, and helping scientists with the following scale-up.

Indexed as

a-dimensional parameterdesign spacemachine learningmodelingoutlet temperatureprocess modelingscale-upspray drying

Identifiers

PMID35214029
PMCPMC8877328
OpenAlexW4210753825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.