Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35213740›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2022

Dominance shifts increase the likelihood of soft selective sweeps.

Pavitra Muralidhar, Carl Veller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Revisiting Dominance in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavitra MuralidharCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-6257
Carl VellerCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-0629-4188
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

The impact of natural selection and population structure on human genomic variationR35GM136290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Graham Coop · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Genome-wide approaches to polygenic adaptationR01GM108779 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COOP, GRAHAM · 2014 to 2019
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108779NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic models of adaptation to a new environment have typically assumed that the alleles involved maintain a constant fitness dominance across the old and new environments. However, theories of dominance suggest that this should often not be the case. Instead, the alleles involved should frequently shift from recessive deleterious in the old environment to dominant beneficial in the new environment. Here, we study the consequences of these expected dominance shifts for the genetics of adaptation to a new environment. We find that dominance shifts increase the likelihood that adaptation occurs from standing variation, and that multiple alleles from the standing variation are involved (a soft selective sweep). Furthermore, we find that expected dominance shifts increase the haplotypic diversity of selective sweeps, rendering soft sweeps more detectable in small genomic samples. In cases where an environmental change threatens the viability of the population, we show that expected dominance shifts of newly beneficial alleles increase the likelihood of evolutionary rescue and the number of alleles involved. Finally, we apply our results to a well-studied case of adaptation to a new environment: the evolution of pesticide resistance at the Ace locus in Drosophila melanogaster. We show that, under reasonable demographic assumptions, the expected dominance shift of resistant alleles causes soft sweeps to be the most frequent outcome in this case, with the primary source of these soft sweeps being the standing variation at the onset of pesticide use, rather than recurrent mutation thereafter.

Indexed as

PesticidesSelection, GeneticAllelesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticMutationPesticides

Identifiers

PMID35213740
PMCPMC9928167
OpenAlexW4220845003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.