Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35213671›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A contextual exploration of healthcare service use in urban slums in Nigeria.

Olufunke Fayehun, Motunrayo Ajisola, Olalekan Uthman, Oyinlola Oyebode, Abiola Oladejo, Eme Owoaje, Olalekan Taiwo, Oladoyin Odubanjo, Bronwyn Harris, Richard Lilford and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Olufunke FayehunDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3769-2130
Motunrayo AjisolaDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olalekan UthmanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Oyinlola OyebodeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Abiola OladejoDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Eme OwoajeDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olalekan TaiwoDepartment of Geography, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-9290-379X
Oladoyin OdubanjoNigerian Academy of Science, Yaba, Nigeria.
Bronwyn HarrisWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Richard LilfordInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Akinyinka OmigbodunDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Improving Health in Slums Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany urban residents in low- and middle-income countries live in unfavorable conditions with few healthcare facilities, calling to question the long-held view of urban advantage in health, healthcare access and utilization. We explore the patterns of healthcare utilization in these deprived neighborhoods by studying three such settlements in Nigeria.

methodsThe study was conducted in three slums in Southwestern Nigeria, categorized as migrant, indigenous or cosmopolitan, based on their characteristics. Using observational data of those who needed healthcare and used in-patient or out-patient services in the 12 months preceding the survey, frequencies, percentages and odds-ratios were used to show the study participants' environmental and population characteristics, relative to their patterns of healthcare use.

resultsA total of 1,634 residents from the three slums participated, distributed as 763 (migrant), 459 (indigenous) and 412 (cosmopolitan). Residents from the migrant (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.51 to 0.97) and indigenous (OR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.93) slums were less likely to have used formal healthcare facilities than those from the cosmopolitan slum. Slum residents were more likely to use formal healthcare facilities for maternal and perinatal conditions, and generalized pains, than for communicable (OR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.72) and non-communicable diseases (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.41 to 0.91). The unemployed had higher odds (OR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.08 to 1.93) of using formal healthcare facilities than those currently employed.

conclusionThe cosmopolitan slum, situated in a major financial center and national economic hub, had a higher proportion of formal healthcare facility usage than the migrant and indigenous slums where about half of families were classified as poor. The urban advantage premise and Anderson behavioral model remain a practical explanatory framework, although they may not explain healthcare use in all possible slum types in Africa. A context-within-context approach is important for addressing healthcare utilization challenges in slums in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommunicable DiseasesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndigenous PeoplesMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaOdds RatioPainPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerinatal CarePoverty AreasPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35213671
PMCPMC8880927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.