Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35213537›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Positive-case follow up for lymphatic filariasis after a transmission assessment survey in Haiti.

Marisa A Hast, Alain Javel, Eurica Denis, Kira Barbre, Jonas Rigodon, Keri Robinson, Tara A Brant, Ryan Wiegand, Katherine Gass, Marc Aurèle Telfort and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A game-theoretic model of lymphatic filariasis prevention.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marisa A HastCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-6700
Alain JavelIMA World Heath, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-9019
Eurica DenisIMA World Heath, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Kira BarbreNeglected Tropical Diseases Support Center (NTD-SC), Task Force for Global Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0785-0468
Jonas RigodonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Country Office, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-9998
Keri RobinsonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-0311
Tara A BrantCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-9408
Ryan WiegandCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9486-1850
Katherine GassNeglected Tropical Diseases Support Center (NTD-SC), Task Force for Global Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-8039
Marc Aurèle TelfortMinistry of Public Health and Population (MSPP), Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Christine DubrayCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphatic filariasis (LF) has been targeted for global elimination as a public health problem since 1997. The primary strategy to interrupt transmission is annual mass drug administration (MDA) for ≥5 years. The transmission assessment survey (TAS) was developed as a decision-making tool to measure LF antigenemia in children to determine when MDA in a region can be stopped. The objective of this study was to investigate potential sampling strategies for follow-up of LF-positive children identified in TAS to detect evidence of ongoing transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE

findingsNippes Department in Haiti passed TAS 1 with 2 positive cases and stopped MDA in 2015; however, 8 positive children were found during TAS 2 in 2017, which prompted a more thorough assessment of ongoing transmission. Purposive sampling was used to select the closest 50 households to each index case household, and systematic random sampling was used to select 20 households from each index case census enumeration area. All consenting household members aged ≥2 years were surveyed and tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using the rapid filarial test strip and for Wb123-specific antibodies using the Filaria Detect IgG4 ELISA. Among 1,927 participants, 1.5% were CFA-positive and 4.5% were seropositive. CFA-positive individuals were identified for 6 of 8 index cases. Positivity ranged from 0.4-2.4%, with highest positivity in the urban commune Miragoane. Purposive sampling found the highest number of CFA-positives (17 vs. 9), and random sampling found a higher percent positive (2.4% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, both purposive and random sampling methods were reasonable and achievable methods of TAS follow-up in resource-limited settings. Both methods identified additional CFA-positives in close geographic proximity to LF-positive children found by TAS, and both identified strong signs of ongoing transmission in the large urban commune of Miragoane. These findings will help inform standardized guidelines for post-TAS surveillance.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialFilaricidesAnimalsAntigens, HelminthChildFollow-Up StudiesHaitiHumansMass Drug AdministrationPrevalenceWuchereria bancroftiAntigens, HelminthFilaricides

Identifiers

PMID35213537
PMCPMC8906642
OpenAlexW4214772400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.