Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35213454›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2022

Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.

Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Marja A Boermeester, Liliana Bordeianou, George J Chang, Emre Gorgun, Christoph Justinger, Elise H Lawson, David J Leaper, Najjia N Mahmoud, Christopher Mantyh and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. From the Oracle of Delphi to Intensive Care Unit Guidelines: Consensus Building Using the Delphi Method.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The snapshot audit methodology: design, implementation and analysis of prospective observational cohort studies in surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Jaime Ruiz-TovarFrom the Department of Surgery, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain (Ruiz-Tovar).
Marja A Boermeesterthe Department of Surgery, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Boermeester).
Liliana Bordeianouthe Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Bordeianou).
George J Changthe Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Chang).
Emre Gorgunthe Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH (Gorgun).
Christoph Justingerthe Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany and Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (Justinger).
Elise H Lawsonthe Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (Lawson).
David J LeaperEmeritus Professor of Surgery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (Leaper).
Najjia N Mahmoudthe Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Mahmoud).
Christopher Mantyhthe Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Mantyh).
Michael F McGeethe Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (McGee).
Valentine Nfonsamthe Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (Nfonsam).
Ines Rubio-Perezthe General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain (Rubio-Perez).
Elizabeth C Wickthe Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Wick).
Traci L Hedrickthe Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA (Hedrick).
Colorectal Delphi Facilitating Group
Cleveland Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USHospital Universitario La Paz · ESMassachusetts General Hospital · USNewcastle University · GBNorthwestern University · USStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have focused on the development and evaluation of care bundles to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) throughout the perioperative period. A focused examination of the technical/surgical aspects of SSI reduction during CRS has not been conducted. This study aimed to develop an expert consensus on intraoperative technical/surgical aspects of SSI prevention by the surgical team during colorectal surgery (CRS). STUDY

designIn a modified Delphi process, a panel of 15 colorectal surgeons developed a consensus on intraoperative technical/surgical aspects of SSI prevention undertaken by surgical personnel during CRS using information from a targeted literature review and expert opinion. Consensus was developed with up to three rounds per topic, with a prespecified threshold of ≥70% agreement.

resultsIn 3 Delphi rounds, the 15 panelists achieved consensus on 16 evidence-based statements. The consensus panel supported the use of wound protectors/retractors, sterile incision closure tray, preclosure glove change, and antimicrobial sutures in reducing SSI along with wound irrigation with aqueous iodine and closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk, contaminated wounds.

conclusionsUsing a modified Delphi method, consensus has been achieved on a tailored set of recommendations on technical/surgical aspects that should be considered by surgical personnel during CRS to reduce the risk of SSI, particularly in areas where the evidence base is controversial or lacking. This document forms the basis for ongoing evidence for the topics discussed in this article or new topics based on newly emerging technologies in CRS.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID35213454
PMCPMC8719508
OpenAlexW4214537429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.