Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35213224›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Large-scale implementation of rapid antigen testing system for COVID-19 in workplaces.

Laura C Rosella, Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, Avi Goldfarb, Sonia Sennik, Janice Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Generalizable Decision-Making Framework for Selecting Onsite versus Send-out Clinical Laboratory Testing.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health and Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-869X
Ajay AgrawalRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0911-2194
Joshua GansRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-5859
Avi GoldfarbRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-5814
Sonia SennikCreative Destruction Lab, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Janice SteinMunk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-8808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in workplaces has been a persistent issue throughout the pandemic. In response, a not-for-profit initiative emerged to mitigate COVID-19 workplace transmission in Canada. We report the process for establishing a workplace frequent rapid antigen test (RAT) program. The screening program identified 473 asymptomatic individuals who tested positive on the RAT and confirmed positive by a nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic test. One in 4300 RATs was presumptive positive but later tested PCR negative, and thus, false positives did not meaningfully disrupt workplace operations. Most employers rated the program highly and felt strongly that the program contributed to workplace and community safety. The findings describe a sustained and scalable implementation plan for establishing a frequent workplace testing program. High-frequency testing programs offer the potential to break chains of transmission and act as an extra layer of protection in a comprehensive public health response.

Identifiers

PMID35213224
PMCPMC8880770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.