Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212802›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2022

Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.

Rayyan Hemetsberger, Mohammad Abdelghani, Ralph Toelg, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Serdar Farhan, Nader Mankerious, Karim Elbasha, Abdelhakim Allali, Stephan Windecker, Thierry Lefèvre and 4 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01356888 naunknown statusnot on this map

BIOTRONIK-Safety and Clinical PerFormance of the Drug ELuting Orsiro Stent in the Treatment of Subjects With Single de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions - II

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiotronik AGRan2011 to 2018Enrolled452ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES)
NCT01939249 naunknown statusnot on this map

BIOTRONIK-A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Subjects With up to Two de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions - IV

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiotronik AGRan2013 to 2020Enrolled585ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsAbbott Laboratories Xience, Biotronik Orsiro
NCT02389946 nacompletednot on this map

BIOTRONIK - A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess the SaFety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro SiroLimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment Of Subjects With up to Three De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions - V

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiotronik, Inc.Ran2015 to 2021Enrolled1,334ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis, Coronary, Myocardial Ischemia, Ischemic Heart DiseaseArmsOrsiro DES, Xience DES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Validation of complex PCI criteria in drug-coated balloon angioplasty.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Rayyan HemetsbergerHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany. rayyan.hemetsberger@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-0916
Mohammad AbdelghaniCardiology Department, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ralph ToelgHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Hector M Garcia-GarciaInterventional Cardiology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Serdar FarhanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Nader MankeriousHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Karim ElbashaHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Abdelhakim AllaliHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Stephan WindeckerInselspital (University Hospital), Bern, Switzerland.
Thierry LefèvreHospital Privé Jaques Cartier, Massy, France.
Shigeru SaitoOkinawa Tokushukai Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.
David KandzariPiedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ron WaksmanInterventional Cardiology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Gert RichardtHeart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Segeberger Kliniken · DEMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USAl-Azhar University · EGBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEHôpital Privé Jacques Cartier · FRIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USPiedmont Atlanta Hospital · USShonan Kamakura General Hospital · JPUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but data are scarce in the era of newer-generation coronary stents.

aimWe sought to compare the clinical outcomes after complex PCI with a bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) versus a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).

methodsPatients (n = 2350) from BIOFLOW-II, -IV, and -V randomized trials were categorized into non-complex PCI vs. complex PCI. Complex PCI had at least one of the following criteria: multi-vessel PCI, ≥ 3 lesions treated, ≥ 3 stents implanted, total stent length ≥ 60 mm. Endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [TV-MI], or target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and probable/definite stent thrombosis (ST) at three years.

resultsPatients with complex PCI (n = 348) were older and presented more often with acute coronary syndrome than non-complex PCI patients (n = 2002). Complex PCI lesions were more often type B2/C and bifurcation lesions and required more pre- and post-dilatation. Complex PCI patients had higher rates of TLF (14.6% vs. 8.1%; aHR 1.89, 95% CI [1.31-2.73], p = 0.001), TV-MI (10.2% vs. 4.4%, aHR 2.17, 95% CI [1.40-3.37], p = 0.001), and ST (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.025) as compared with non-complex PCI. TLF was not lower with BP-SES as compared to DP-EES in complex PCI (12.6% vs 18.2%, p = 0.16).

conclusionPatients undergoing complex PCI with the newer-generation DES still sustain a higher risk of TLF, TV-MI and stent thrombosis as compared with non-complex PCI. This adverse outcome was not significantly modified by the stent platform (BP-SES vs. DP-EES). CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicaltrial.gov NCT01356888, NCT01939249, NCT02389946, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01356888 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01939249 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02389946 .

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionEverolimusHumansMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesMyocardial InfarctionPolymersProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSirolimusTreatment OutcomeEverolimusMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesoligomycin sensitivity-conferring proteinPolymersSirolimusBIOFLOWComplex percutaneous coronary interventionNewer-generation drug-eluting stentOrsiroXience

Identifiers

PMID35212802
OpenAlexW4214685955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.