Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212775›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Acoustic measurements are useful therapeutic indicators of patients with dysphonia-related to reflux.

Jerome R Lechien, Sven Saussez, Géraldine Nowak, Lise Crevier-Buchman, Marta P Circiu, Alexandra Rodriguez, Stéphane Hans

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerome R LechienDepartment of Otolaryngology, Elsan Hospital, Paris, France. Jerome.Lechien@umons.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-0845
Sven SaussezDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Géraldine NowakDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Lise Crevier-BuchmanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
Marta P CirciuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Elsan Hospital, Paris, France.
Alexandra Rodriguez *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Stéphane Hans *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEELSA · FRUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective is to study the usefulness of acoustic measurements as therapeutic outcomes for patients with dysphonia related to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

methodsFrom September 2019 to April 2021, 120 patients with LPR at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH) were prospectively recruited from three University Hospitals. They were divided in two groups regarding the presence of dysphonia. The treatment consisted of a combination of diet, proton-pump inhibitors, magaldrate and alginate for 3-6 months. The following clinical and acoustic evaluations were studied regarding groups at baseline, 3- and 6-month posttreatment: reflux symptom score (RSS), reflux sign assessment (RSA), percent jitter, percent shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR).

resultsA total of 109 patients completed the evaluations, accounting for 49 dysphonic and 60 non-dysphonic individuals. HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy, baseline clinical and acoustic features were comparable between groups. RSS and RSA significantly improved from pre- to 3-month posttreatment in both groups. Jitter, Shimmer and NHR significantly improved from pre- to 3-month posttreatment in dysphonic patients, without additional 3- to 6-month posttreatment changes. Acoustic parameters did not change throughout treatment in patients without dysphonia.

conclusionAcoustic measurements may be an interesting indicator of treatment in LPR patients who reported dysphonia. In this group of individuals, the evolution of acoustic parameters was consistent with the evolution of symptoms and findings.

Indexed as

DysphoniaEsophagitis, PepticLaryngopharyngeal RefluxAcousticsEsophageal pH MonitoringHoarsenessHumansProspective StudiesAcousticDysphoniaGastroesophagealImpedanceLaryngopharyngealpH monitoringRefluxVoice

Identifiers

PMID35212775
OpenAlexW4214510417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.