Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212604›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2022

Microbiological insights into anaerobic digestion for biogas, hydrogen or volatile fatty acids (VFAs): a review.

Sharareh Harirchi, Steven Wainaina, Taner Sar, Seyed Ali Nojoumi, Milad Parchami, Mohsen Parchami, Sunita Varjani, Samir Kumar Khanal, Jonathan Wong, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sharareh HarirchiSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0957-7506
Steven WainainaSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-5126
Taner SarSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-9638
Seyed Ali NojoumiMicrobiology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-6112
Milad ParchamiSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4709-6631
Mohsen ParchamiSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-8614
Sunita VarjaniParyavaran Bhavan, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7768
Samir Kumar KhanalDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6680-5846
Jonathan WongDepartment of Biology, Institute of Bioresource and Agriculture and, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-259X
Mukesh Kumar AwasthiCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Taicheng Road 3#, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-184X
Mohammad J TaherzadehSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4887-2433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, considerable attention has been directed toward anaerobic digestion (AD), which is an effective biological process for converting diverse organic wastes into biogas, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), biohydrogen, etc. The microbial bioprocessing takes part during AD is of substantial significance, and one of the crucial approaches for the deep and adequate understanding and manipulating it toward different products is process microbiology. Due to highly complexity of AD microbiome, it is critically important to study the involved microorganisms in AD. In recent years, in addition to traditional methods, novel molecular techniques and meta-omics approaches have been developed which provide accurate details about microbial communities involved AD. Better understanding of process microbiomes could guide us in identifying and controlling various factors in both improving the AD process and diverting metabolic pathway toward production of selective bio-products. This review covers various platforms of AD process that results in different final products from microbiological point of view. The review also highlights distinctive interactions occurring among microbial communities. Furthermore, assessment of these communities existing in the anaerobic digesters is discussed to provide more insights into their structure, dynamics, and metabolic pathways. Moreover, the important factors affecting microbial communities in each platform of AD are highlighted. Finally, the review provides some recent applications of AD for the production of novel bio-products and deals with challenges and future perspectives of AD.

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisBiofuelsBioreactorsFatty Acids, VolatileHydrogenMicrobiotaBiofuelsFatty Acids, VolatileHydrogenAnaerobic digestionartificial rumeninterspecies electron transfermicrobial communitiessyntrophyWood-Ljungdahl pathway

Identifiers

PMID35212604
PMCPMC8973982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.