Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212571›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2022

A Nationwide Analysis of Risk of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Mortality following an Initial Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy with Long-Term Followup.

Sandra Miriam Kawa, Hein Vincent Stroomberg, Signe Benzon Larsen, John Thomas Helgstrand, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Andrew Julian Vickers, Klaus Brasso, Martin Andreas Røder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Miriam KawaCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-0501
Hein Vincent StroombergCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-9506
Signe Benzon LarsenCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Thomas HelgstrandCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6724-6003
Birgitte Grønkær ToftDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrew Julian VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1525-6503
Klaus BrassoCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin Andreas RøderCopenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-6416
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted prostate biopsy has been shown to find many high-grade prostate cancers in men with concurrent negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic biopsy. The oncologic risk of such tumors can be explored by looking at long-term outcomes of men with negative TRUS biopsy followed without MRI. The aim was to analyze the mortality after initial and second negative TRUS biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll men who underwent initial TRUS biopsies between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2016 in Denmark were included. A total of 37,214 men had a negative initial TRUS biopsy and 6,389 underwent a re-biopsy. Risk of cause-specific mortality was analyzed with competing risks. Diagnosis of Gleason score ≥7 prostate cancer following negative biopsies was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression including time to re-biopsy, prostate specific antigen (PSA), age and digital rectal examination.

resultsThe 15-year prostate cancer-specific mortality was 1.9% (95% CI: 1.7-2.1). Prostate cancer-specific mortality was 1.3% (95% CI: 0.9-1.6) and 4.6% (95% CI: 3.4-5.8) for men with PSA <10 and >20 ng/ml, respectively. Of the TRUS re-biopsies 12% were Gleason score ≥7 and risk of Gleason score ≥7 increased with longer time to re-biopsy (p <0.001). Mortality after re-biopsy was similar to after initial biopsy.

conclusionsMen with negative TRUS biopsies have a very low prostate cancer-specific mortality, especially with PSA <10 ng/ml. This raises serious questions about the routine use of MRI targeting for initial prostate biopsy and suggests that MRI targeting should only be recommended for men with PSA >10 ng/ml after negative biopsy.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleNeoplasm GradingProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigenbiopsyepidemiologymagnetic resonance imagingmortalityprostatic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID35212571
PMCPMC9428937
OpenAlexW4214617314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.