Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212396›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2022

An opinion piece: the evolutionary and ecological consequences of changing selection pressures on marine migration in Atlantic salmon.

Colin E Adams, Louise Chavarie, Jessica R Rodger, Hannele M Honkanen, Davide Thambithurai, Matthew P Newton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colin E AdamsScottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-9754
Louise ChavarieScottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.
Jessica R RodgerAtlantic Salmon Trust Fellow, Scottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-6533
Hannele M HonkanenScottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-4359
Davide ThambithuraiAtlantic Salmon Trust Fellow, Scottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0338-3778
Matthew P NewtonScottish Centre for Ecology & the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Rowardennan, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6099-7338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are strong signals that the selection forces favouring the expression of long-distance sea migration by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are changing. Unlike many other behavioural traits, the costs of migration are incurred before any fitness benefits become apparent to the migrant. The expression of this behaviour has thus been shaped by selection forces over multiple generations and cannot respond to short interval (within a single generation) environmental change as many other behavioural traits can. Here we provide a framework to examine the evolutionary and ecological consequences of a sustained increase in migration cost. We argue that Atlantic salmon may have entered an evolutionary trap, where long-distance sea migration has become maladaptive because of shifting environmental conditions. We predict that if higher migration costs (affecting survivorship and ultimately fitness) persist, then shifting selection pressures will result in continuing declines in population size. We suggest, however, that in some populations there is demonstrable capacity for evolutionary rescue responses within the species which is to be found in the variation in the expression of migration. Under a scenario of low to moderate change in the selection forces that previously promoted migration, we argue that disruptive, sex-based selection would result in partial migration, where females retain sea migration but with anadromy loss predominantly in males. With more acute selection forces, anadromy may be strongly selected against, under these conditions both sexes may become freshwater resident. We suggest that as the migration costs appear to be higher in catchments with standing waters, then this outcome is more likely in such systems. We also speculate that as a result of the genetic structuring in this species, not all populations may have the capacity to respond adequately to change. The consequences of this for the species and its management are discussed.

Indexed as

Salmo salarAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMalePhenotypePopulation DensityPressureanadromy lossfitness changelife-history strategymigration evolution

Identifiers

PMID35212396
PMCPMC9311443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.