Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212355›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2022

WHIRLY1 functions in the nucleus to regulate barley leaf development and associated metabolite profiles.

Barbara Karpinska, Nurhayati Razak, Euan K James, Jenny A Morris, Susan R Verrall, Peter E Hedley, Robert D Hancock, Christine H Foyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genome-Wide Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. WHIRLY protein functions in plants.Food and energy security · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Karpinska *School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.
Nurhayati Razak *School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.
Euan K JamesEnvironmental Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, U.K.
Jenny A MorrisCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, U.K.
Susan R VerrallEnvironmental Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, U.K.
Peter E HedleyCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, U.K.
Robert D HancockCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, U.K.
Christine H FoyerSchool of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-6989
James Hutton Institute · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHIRLY (WHY) DNA/RNA binding proteins fulfil multiple but poorly characterised functions in leaf development. Here, we show that WHY1 transcript levels were highest in the bases of 7-day old barley leaves. Immunogold labelling revealed that the WHY1 protein was more abundant in the nuclei than the proplastids of the leaf bases. To identify transcripts associated with leaf development we conducted hierarchical clustering of differentially abundant transcripts along the developmental gradient of wild-type leaves. Similarly, metabolite profiling was employed to identify metabolites exhibiting a developmental gradient. A comparative analysis of transcripts and metabolites in barley lines (W1-1 and W1-7) lacking WHY1, which show delayed greening compared with the wild type revealed that the transcript profile of leaf development was largely unchanged in W1-1 and W1-7 leaves. However, there were differences in levels of several transcripts encoding transcription factors associated with chloroplast development. These include a barley homologue of the Arabidopsis GATA transcription factor that regulates stomatal development, greening and chloroplast development, NAC1; two transcripts with similarity to Arabidopsis GLK1 and two transcripts encoding ARF transcriptions factors with functions in leaf morphogenesis and development. Chloroplast proteins were less abundant in the W1-1 and W1-7 leaves than the wild type. The levels of tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites and GABA were significantly lower in WHY1 knockdown leaves than the wild type. This study provides evidence that WHY1 is localised in the nuclei of leaf bases, contributing the regulation of nuclear-encoded transcripts that regulate chloroplast development.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsHordeumCell NucleusDNA-Binding ProteinsGATA Transcription FactorsPlant LeavesTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGATA Transcription FactorsGLK1 protein, ArabidopsisTranscription FactorsWhirly1 protein, Arabidopsiscell nucleuschloroplastdevelopmentphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID35212355
PMCPMC9022988
OpenAlexW4214500994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.