ReviewPathologica2022
Congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract: the liver, extrahepatic biliary tree and pancreas.
Review in Pathologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting the Human Gut Microbiota-Between Conventional Therapy and Precision Genetic Engineering.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Association of maternal biliary disease with hepatopancreatobiliary morbidity in offspring.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- Ultrasound of Bile Ducts-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, and Their Influencing Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of heterotopic pancreas.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Ectopic ampulla of vater in D4 with adenosquamous carcinoma: case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Accurate resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma using eOrganmap 3D reconstruction and full quantization technique.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Correlation between Pancreatic Duct Variation and Related Diseases: An Effective Method Observing the Dual-Energy CT with Low-keV Monoenergetic Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital anomalies of the liver, biliary tree and pancreas are rare birth defects, some of which are characterized by a marked variation in geographical incidence. Morphogenesis of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic structures initiates from two tubular endodermal evaginations of the most distal portion of the foregut. The pancreas develops from a larger dorsal and a smaller ventral outpouching; emergence of the two buds will eventually lead to the fusion of the duct system. A small part of the remaining ventral diverticulum divides into a "pars cystica" and "pars hepatica", giving rise to the cystic duct and gallbladder and the liver lobes, respectively. Disruption or malfunctioning of the complex mechanisms leading to the development of liver, gallbladder, biliary tree and pancreas can result in numerous, albeit fortunately relatively rare, congenital anomalies in these organs. The type and severity of anomalies often depend on the exact moment in which disruption or alteration of the embryological mechanisms takes place. Many theories have been brought forward to explain their embryological basis; however, no agreement has yet been reached for most of them. While in some cases pathological evaluation might be more centered on macroscopic evaluation, in other instances small biopsies will be the keystone to understanding organ function and treatment results in the context of congenital anomalies. Thus, knowledge of the existence and histopathological characteristics of some of the more common conditions is mandatory for every pathologist working in the field of gastrointestinal pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.