ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2022
Using a statistical learning approach to identify sociodemographic and clinical predictors of response to clozapine.
Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Antipsychotic Effectiveness and Separate Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Hospitalized Schizophrenia Patients.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Clinical response to clozapine in Black people with psychosis: A secondary analysis of an open-label clinical trial.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Ensuring generalizability and clinical utility in mental health care applications: Robust artificial intelligence-based treatment predictions in diverse psychosis populations.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Personalized Prediction of Clozapine Treatment Response Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Japanese Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the Intervention from a Mental Health Day Hospital with Patients with Various Mental Disorders in Burgos, Spain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A transdiagnostic prodrome for severe mental disorders: an electronic health record study.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis.Translational psychiatry · 2023Review
- Self-Assembling Lecithin-Based Mixed Polymeric Micelles for Nose to Brain Delivery of Clozapine: In-vivo Assessment of Drug Efficacy via Radiobiological Evaluation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- Clinical predictors of antipsychotic treatment resistance: Development and internal validation of a prognostic prediction model by the STRATA-G consortium.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA proportion of people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia fail to show improvement on clozapine treatment. Knowledge of the sociodemographic and clinical factors predicting clozapine response may be useful in developing personalised approaches to treatment.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the electronic health records of the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) hospital between 2007 and 2011. Using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression statistical learning approach, we examined 35 sociodemographic and clinical factors' predictive ability of response to clozapine at 3 months of treatment. Response was assessed by the level of change in the severity of the symptoms using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
resultsWe identified 242 service-users with a treatment-resistant psychotic disorder who had their first trial of clozapine and continued the treatment for at least 3 months. The LASSO regression identified three predictors of response to clozapine: higher severity of illness at baseline, female gender and having a comorbid mood disorder. These factors are estimated to explain 18% of the variance in clozapine response. The model's optimism-corrected calibration slope was 1.37, suggesting that the model will underfit when applied to new data.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that women, people with a comorbid mood disorder and those who are most ill at baseline respond better to clozapine. However, the accuracy of the internally validated and recalibrated model was low. Therefore, future research should indicate whether a prediction model developed by including routinely collected data, in combination with biological information, presents adequate predictive ability to be applied in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.