Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212146›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022

In-field genetic stock identification of overwintering coho salmon in the Gulf of Alaska: Evaluation of Nanopore sequencing for remote real-time deployment.

Christoph M Deeg, Ben J G Sutherland, Tobi J Ming, Colin Wallace, Kim Jonsen, Kelsey L Flynn, Eric B Rondeau, Terry D Beacham, Kristina M Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christoph M DeegForest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4459-9372
Ben J G SutherlandFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-9893
Tobi J MingFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Colin WallaceFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Kim JonsenFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Kelsey L FlynnFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Eric B RondeauFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Terry D BeachamFisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-8445
Kristina M MillerForest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Fisheries and Oceans CanadaMitacs IT13895Pacific Salmon CommissionPacific Salmon Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic stock identification (GSI) from genotyping-by-sequencing of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci has become the gold standard for stock of origin identification in Pacific salmon. The sequencing platforms currently applied require large batch sizes and multiday processing in specialized facilities to perform genotyping by the thousands. However, recent advances in third-generation single-molecule sequencing platforms, such as the Oxford Nanopore minION, provide base calling on portable, pocket-sized sequencers and promise real-time, in-field stock identification of variable batch sizes. Here we evaluate utility and comparability to established GSI platforms of at-sea stock identification of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) using targeted SNP amplicon sequencing on the minION platform during a high-sea winter expedition to the Gulf of Alaska. As long read sequencers are not optimized for short amplicons, we concatenate amplicons to increase coverage and throughput. Nanopore sequencing at-sea yielded data sufficient for stock assignment for 50 out of 80 individuals. Nanopore-based SNP calls agreed with Ion Torrent-based genotypes in 83.25%, but assignment of individuals to stock of origin only agreed in 61.5% of individuals, highlighting inherent challenges of Nanopore sequencing, such as resolution of homopolymer tracts and indels. However, poor representation of assayed salmon in the queried baseline data set contributed to poor assignment confidence on both platforms. Future improvements will focus on lowering turnaround time and cost, increasing accuracy and throughput, as well as augmentation of the existing baselines. If successfully implemented, Nanopore sequencing will provide an alternative method to the large-scale laboratory approach by providing mobile small batch genotyping to diverse stakeholders.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingOncorhynchus kisutchAlaskaAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNAat-seagenetic stock identificationmobileNanoporesalmonsingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID35212146
PMCPMC9303916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.