Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212086›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2022

Manipulating the microbiome alters regenerative outcomes in Xenopus laevis tadpoles via lipopolysaccharide signalling.

Phoebe A Chapman, Campbell B Gilbert, Thomas J Devine, Daniel T Hudson, Joanna Ward, Xochitl C Morgan, Caroline W Beck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Commensal skin bacteria interact with the innate immune system to promote tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Manipulating the microbiome alters regenerative outcomes in Xenopus laevis tadpoles via lipopolysaccharide signalling.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phoebe A ChapmanDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Campbell B GilbertDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Thomas J DevineDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel T HudsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Joanna WardDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Xochitl C MorganDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Caroline W BeckDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6489-7425
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenopus laevis tadpoles can regenerate functional tails, containing the spinal cord, notochord, muscle, fin, blood vessels and nerves, except for a brief refractory period at around 1 week of age. At this stage, amputation of the tadpole's tail may either result in scarless wound healing or the activation of a regeneration programme, which replaces the lost tissues. We recently demonstrated a link between bacterial lipopolysaccharides and successful tail regeneration in refractory stage tadpoles and proposed that this could result from lipopolysaccharides binding to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Here, we have used 16S rRNA sequencing to show that the tadpole skin microbiome is highly variable between sibships and that the community can be altered by raising embryos in the antibiotic gentamicin. Six Gram-negative genera, including Delftia and Chryseobacterium, were over-represented in tadpoles that underwent tail regeneration. Lipopolysaccharides purified from a commensal Chryseobacterium spp. XDS4, an exogenous Delftia spp. or Escherichia coli, could significantly increase the number of antibiotic-raised tadpoles that attempted regeneration. Conversely, the quality of regeneration was impaired in native-raised tadpoles exposed to the antagonistic lipopolysaccharide of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Editing TLR4 using CRISPR/Cas9 also reduced regeneration quality, but not quantity, at the level of the cohort. However, we found that the editing level of individual tadpoles was a poor predictor of regenerative outcome. In conclusion, our results suggest that variable regeneration in refractory stage tadpoles depends at least in part on the skin microbiome and lipopolysaccharide signalling, but that signalling via TLR4 cannot account for all of this effect.

Indexed as

LipopolysaccharidesMicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLarvaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SToll-Like Receptor 4Wound HealingXenopus laevisAnti-Bacterial AgentsLipopolysaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID35212086
PMCPMC9790228
OpenAlexW4214482100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.