Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212084›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2022

Arctic marine forest distribution models showcase potentially severe habitat losses for cryophilic species under climate change.

Trevor T Bringloe, David P Wilkinson, Jesica Goldsmit, Amanda M Savoie, Karen Filbee-Dexter, Kathleen A Macgregor, Kimberly L Howland, Christopher W McKindsey, Heroen Verbruggen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Light-mediated temperature susceptibility of kelp species (Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Trevor T BringloeSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5976-6700
David P WilkinsonSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9560-6499
Jesica GoldsmitFisheries and Oceans Canada, Arctic and Aquatic Research Division, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1758-2700
Amanda M SavoieCentre for Arctic Knowledge and Exploration, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-9106
Karen Filbee-DexterDépartement de Biologie, ArcticNet, Québec Océan, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-6797
Kathleen A MacgregorFisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-8238
Kimberly L HowlandFisheries and Oceans Canada, Arctic and Aquatic Research Division, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-3290
Christopher W McKindseyFisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont-Joli, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-6454
Heroen VerbruggenSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6305-4749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic is among the fastest-warming areas of the globe. Understanding the impact of climate change on foundational Arctic marine species is needed to provide insight on ecological resilience at high latitudes. Marine forests, the underwater seascapes formed by seaweeds, are predicted to expand their ranges further north in the Arctic in a warmer climate. Here, we investigated whether northern habitat gains will compensate for losses at the southern range edge by modelling marine forest distributions according to three distribution categories: cryophilic (species restricted to the Arctic environment), cryotolerant (species with broad environmental preferences inclusive but not limited to the Arctic environment), and cryophobic (species restricted to temperate conditions) marine forests. Using stacked MaxEnt models, we predicted the current extent of suitable habitat for contemporary and future marine forests under Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios of increasing emissions (2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5). Our analyses indicate that cryophilic marine forests are already ubiquitous in the north, and thus cannot expand their range under climate change, resulting in an overall loss of habitat due to severe southern range contractions. The extent of marine forests within the Arctic basin, however, is predicted to remain largely stable under climate change with notable exceptions in some areas, particularly in the Canadian Archipelago. Succession may occur where cryophilic and cryotolerant species are extirpated at their southern range edge, resulting in ecosystem shifts towards temperate regimes at mid to high latitudes, though many aspects of these shifts, such as total biomass and depth range, remain to be field validated. Our results provide the first global synthesis of predicted changes to pan-Arctic coastal marine forest ecosystems under climate change and suggest ecosystem transitions are unavoidable now for some areas.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemArctic RegionsCanadaForestsecological niche modellingkelpMaxEnt modelsseaweed

Identifiers

PMID35212084
PMCPMC9314671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.