Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212055›Full record

Trial reportPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2022

Evaluating an online self-help intervention for parents of children with food allergies.

Naomi Sugunasingha, Fergal W Jones, George du Toit, Christina J Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating an online self-help intervention for parents of children with food allergies.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi SugunasinghaSalomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Fergal W JonesSalomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Tunbridge Wells, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9459-6631
George du ToitEvelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christina J JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-6631
Canterbury Christ Church University · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents of children with food allergies (CwFA) experience reduced quality of life (QoL) and may have reduced access to in-person interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic. This trial developed and evaluated an online, self-help, information provision website, aimed at improving QoL in parents of CwFA.

methodsIn a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT), participants were randomised to either receive access to the website or a waiting-list control. At baseline, post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 8), measures of parental food allergy-related QoL, depression, anxiety, stress, intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and self-efficacy were obtained.

resultsA total of 205 participants were randomised; 97% were females, 91% white and 78% educated ≥ degree level, with a mean age of 38.95 years (SD = 6.89). 44.9% (n = 92) were retained at follow-up. The arms did not significantly differ on any outcome at any time point. For a sub-group of participants above the clinical cut-off for depression at baseline, the intervention may have improved QoL. Participants reported the website content as useful and accessible, but accessed it infrequently. In baseline data, IU and self-efficacy were significantly associated with QoL.

conclusionWhile the COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged greater provision of online interventions, our RCT suggests this particular website is not suitable for this population in general, although future research could examine its efficacy for depressed parents of CwFA, to increase confidence that the sub-group finding was not a Type 1 error. The baseline data suggest IU and self-efficacy remain potential proximal targets for intervention.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food HypersensitivityInternet-Based InterventionAdultChildFemaleHumansParentsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2food allergyinterventiononlineparentsquality of lifeself-helpwebsite

Identifiers

PMID35212055
PMCPMC9306710
OpenAlexW4210637372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.