Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212033›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2022

Comparison of two staining techniques on the manual and automated canine sperm morphology analysis.

Paulina Surmacz, Anna Niwinska, Ewa Kautz, Slawomir Gizinski, Ricardo Faundez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Standardisation of Dog Sperm Morphology Classification.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulina SurmaczDepartment of Large Animal Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences WULS - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna NiwinskaDepartment of Large Animal Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences WULS - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-9237
Ewa KautzInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Slawomir GizinskiDepartment of Large Animal Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences WULS - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Ricardo FaundezInviMed Fertility Clinics, Warsaw, Poland.
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PLInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences · PLWest Coast Fertility Centers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed and direct analysis of semen, including sperm morphology, enables a diagnosis of male fertility. This study aimed to describe an economical and verified protocol for canine spermiograms and compare the effectiveness of Sperm Stain

Indexed as

Semen AnalysisSpermatozoaAnimalsCell CountColoring AgentsDogsMaleSperm CountSperm MotilityStaining and LabelingColoring AgentsandrologyCASAdog spermiogramSperm Blue®sperm morphologySperm Stain®

Identifiers

PMID35212033
PMCPMC9311200
OpenAlexW4214593516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.