Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35211933›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Salvage Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Case Series of Brazilian Patients.

Antônio Luiz Frasson, Martina Lichtenfels, Fernanda Barbosa, Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza, Ana Beatriz Falcone, Isabela Miranda, Betina Vollbrecht, Carolina Malhone, José Yoshikazu Tariki

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antônio Luiz FrassonHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-6898
Martina LichtenfelsPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-4646
Fernanda BarbosaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-1993
Alessandra Borba Anton de SouzaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6215-7076
Ana Beatriz FalconeHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0267-9390
Isabela MirandaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9878-8996
Betina VollbrechtPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7309-6029
Carolina MalhoneHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-8315
José Yoshikazu TarikiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-7959
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew studies analyzed the safety of salvage nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for local relapse treatment. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with indications for mastectomy who chose to undergo NSM for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

methodsBetween January 2001 and December 2018, we evaluated 24 women who underwent NSM for local relapse after conservative surgery.

resultsThe patients were followed up for a mean time of 132 months since the first surgery. After the NSM, 5 (20.8%) patients were diagnosed with local recurrence and only 1 (4.2%) patient died. The patients presented 4.8% (2) of partial and 2.4% (1) of total nipple necrosis.

conclusionIn this long-term follow-up since the first surgery, we observed low rates of complication and good survival, although associated with high local recurrence in patients diagnosed with IBTR undergoing NSM as salvage surgery. We demonstrated that NSM may be considered after IBTR for patients who did not want to undergo total mastectomy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBrazilFemaleHumansMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35211933
PMCPMC9948044
OpenAlexW4214701604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.