ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022
Independent mechanisms of temporal and linguistic cue correspondence benefiting audiovisual speech processing.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Articulatory timing and form support distinct neural benefits during audiovisual speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Audiovisual Speech Perception Benefits are Stable from Preschool through Adolescence.Multisensory research · 2024Article
- The effects of temporal cues, point-light displays, and faces on speech identification and listening effort.PloS one · 2023Article
- Performance in an Audiovisual Selective Attention Task Using Speech-Like Stimuli Depends on the Talker Identities, But Not Temporal Coherence.Trends in hearingArticle
- Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.Trends in hearingArticle
- Assessing Visual Contributions to the Perception of Speech in Noise.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that in order to comprehend speech in noisy environments, listeners use the face of the talker in conjunction with the auditory speech. Yet how listeners use audiovisual speech correspondences along the multisensory speech processing pathway is not known. We engaged listeners in a pair of experiments using face rotation to partially dissociate linguistic and temporal information and two tasks to assess both overall integration and early integration specifically. In our first exploratory experiment, listeners performed a speech in noise task to determine which face rotation maximally disrupts speech comprehension and thus overall audiovisual integration. Our second experiment involved a dual pitch discrimination and visual catch task to test specifically for binding. The results showed that temporal coherence supports early integration, replicating the importance of temporal coherence seen for binding nonspeech stimuli. However, the benefit of temporal coherence was present in both upright and inverted positions, suggesting that binding is minimally affected by face rotation under these conditions. Together, our results suggest that different aspects of audio-visual speech are integrated at different stages of multisensory speech processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35211849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.