ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2022
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Prediction in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Liver cancer risk stratification using deep learning on nationwide longitudinal health screening data: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Racial Disparities in Comorbidity Patterns of Early-Onset Liver Cancer: A Machine Learning Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in persons with known risk factors remain a challenge and is an urgent unmet need, considering projected increases in HCC incidence and mortality in the US. We aimed to use machine learning techniques to identify a set of demographic, lifestyle, and health history information that can be used simultaneously for population-level HCC risk prediction.
methodsData from 377,065 participants of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, among whom 647 developed HCC over 16 years of follow-up, were analyzed. The sample was randomly divided into independent training (60%) and validation (40%) sets. We evaluated 123 participant characteristics and tested 15 different machine learning algorithms for robustness in predicting HCC risk. Separately, we evaluated variables selected from multivariable logistic regression for risk prediction.
resultsThe random under-sampling boosting (RUSBoost) algorithm performed best during model testing. Fourteen participant characteristics were selected for risk prediction based on differences between cases and controls (Bonferroni-corrected p-values <0.0004) and from the most frequently used variables in the initial two decision trees of the RUSBoost learner trees. A predictive model based on the 14 variables had an AUC of 0.72 (sensitivity=0.68, specificity=0.63) and independent validation AUC of 0.65 (sensitivity=0.68, specificity=0.63). A subset of 9 variables identified through logistic regression also had an AUC of 0.72 (sensitivity=0.67, specificity=0.63) and independent validation AUC of 0.65 (sensitivity=0.70, specificity=0.61).
conclusionPopulation-level HCC risk prediction can be performed with a machine learning-based algorithm and could inform strategies for improving HCC risk reduction in at-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.