Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35211421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Human Stool Preservation Impacts Taxonomic Profiles in 16S Metagenomics Studies.

Anne Plauzolles, Eya Toumi, Marion Bonnet, Guillaume Pénaranda, Ghislain Bidaut, Laurent Chiche, Jérôme Allardet-Servent, Frédérique Retornaz, Benoit Goutorbe, Philippe Halfon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne PlauzollesClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.
Eya ToumiClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.
Marion BonnetClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.
Guillaume PénarandaClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.
Ghislain BidautCRCM, Aix-Marseille Univ U105, Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Laurent ChicheInfectious and Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Européen Marseille, Marseille, France.
Jérôme Allardet-ServentIntensive Care Unit, Hôpital Européen Marseille, Marseille, France.
Frédérique RetornazInfectious and Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Européen Marseille, Marseille, France.
Benoit GoutorbeClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.
Philippe HalfonClinical Research and R&D Department, Laboratoire Européen Alphabio, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiotas play critical roles in human health, yet in most cases scientists lack standardized and reproducible methods from collection and preservation of samples, as well as the choice of omic analysis, up to the data processing. To date, stool sample preservation remains a source of technological bias in metagenomic sequencing, despite newly developed storage solutions. Here, we conducted a comparative study of 10 storage methods for human stool over a 14-day period of storage at fluctuating temperatures. We first compared the performance of each stabilizer with observed bacterial composition variation within the same specimen. Then, we identified the nature of the observed variations to determine which bacterial populations were more impacted by the stabilizer. We found that DNA stabilizers display various stabilizing efficacies and affect the recovered bacterial profiles thus highlighting that some solutions are more performant in preserving the true gut microbial community. Furthermore, our results showed that the bias associated with the stabilizers can be linked to the phenotypical traits of the bacterial populations present in the studied samples. Although newly developed storage solutions have improved our capacity to stabilize stool microbial content over time, they are nevertheless not devoid of biases hence requiring the implantation of standard operating procedures. Acknowledging the biases and limitations of the implemented method is key to better interpret and support true associated microbiome patterns that will then lead us towards personalized medicine, in which the microbiota profile could constitute a reliable tool for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomicsFecesHumansMetagenomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecimen HandlingRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S metagenomicshuman gutmicrobiotapreservationstabilizing solution.standardizationstool

Identifiers

PMID35211421
PMCPMC8860989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.