ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021
Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban in Clinical Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Tirofiban Combination Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving reperfusion treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke without large and medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral infarction beyond the thrombolysis window: a non-randomized trial with preliminary findings.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Optimizing Early Antithrombotic Therapy Within 24 Hours of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Acute Treatment of Disabling and Nondisabling Minor Ischemic Stroke: Expert Guidance for Clinicians.Stroke · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Tirofiban combined with oral antiplatelet therapy in progressive ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Tirofiban for Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 48 Hours of Onset: Evidence From a Dual-Method Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching and Multivariable Regression.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of safety and efficacy of Tirofiban injection for treating acute ischemic stroke beyond standard time window.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Real-world safety of tirofiban: a disproportionality analysis using data from FAERS and WHO-VigiAccess.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Management of Incomplete Microcirculatory Reperfusion After Endovascular Thrombectomy: Focus on Inhibition of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Pathway.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Anticoagulation Options for Cranial Procedures: A Comparative Review of Aspirin, Plavix, and Aggrastat.Cureus · 2023Review
- An Updated Review on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors as Antiplatelet Agents: Basic and Clinical Perspectives.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023Review
- Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy have been approved for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, only a minority of patients received these treatments in China. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with AIS who were not undergoing early recanalization treatments.
methodsPatients with mild-to-moderate stroke [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 4-15] were enrolled in this study. Patients due to cardiogenic embolism were excluded. Eligible patients within 12 h from symptom onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tirofiban (a loading dose of 0.4 μg/kg/min over 30 min and a maintenance dose of 0.1 μg/kg/min up to 48 h) followed by regular treatment or to receive regular treatment (aspirin at a dose of 100 mg per day for 90 days) (control). The primary outcome was the proportion of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days [defined as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2]. The secondary outcomes included a shift in the distribution of the mRS scores at 90 days and the NIHSS score at 24 h and 7 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 7 days after tirofiban treatment.
resultsA total of 380 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the tirofiban group (
conclusionOur trial supports that tirofiban was safe and effective and might be a remedial treatment for patients with AIS who did not receive recanalization treatments. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR2000031297.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.