Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210863›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Guidelines for Management of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events During Rucaparib Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Brian W Labadie, David S Morris, Alan H Bryce, Robert Given, Jingsong Zhang, Wassim Abida, Simon Chowdhury, Akash Patnaik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian W LabadieSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
David S MorrisUrology Associates, P.C., Nashville, TN, USA.
Alan H BryceHematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Robert GivenDepartment of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Jingsong ZhangGenitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-5116
Wassim AbidaGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Simon ChowdhuryMedical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Akash PatnaikSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USGuy's Hospital · GBMayo Clinic Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USUrology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe US Food and Drug Administration has recently granted accelerated approval of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib as treatment for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) associated with a deleterious germline or somatic MATERIALS AND

methodsSafety data were identified from PubMed and congress publications of trials involving men with mCRPC treated with oral rucaparib monotherapy (600 mg twice daily). Management guidelines for TEAEs were developed based on trial protocols, prescribing information, oncology association guidance, and the authors' clinical experience.

resultsIn clinical trials of men with mCRPC who received rucaparib (n = 193), TEAEs observed were consistent with that of other PARP inhibitors. The most frequent any-grade TEAEs included gastrointestinal events, asthenia/fatigue, anemia, increased alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, rash, and thrombocytopenia; the most frequent grade ≥3 TEAE was anemia. The majority of TEAEs were self-limiting and did not require treatment modification or interruption. Here, we provide recommendations on management of the most common TEAEs reported with rucaparib as well as other TEAEs of interest.

conclusionRucaparib's recent approval for treatment of BRCA-mutant mCRPC is practice changing. Proper management of TEAEs will allow maximum treatment benefit for patients receiving rucaparib.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerpoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitorsrucaparib

Identifiers

PMID35210863
PMCPMC8860352
OpenAlexW4213356154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.