ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Survivorship of the C-Stem total hip replacement using the "French Paradox" technique.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maximizing stem body size may reduce the risk of postoperative periprosthetic fractures : an analysis of 2,757 CPT femoral components.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Increased risk of periprosthetic fracture associated with decreased aseptic loosening in C-stem compared with the Charnley Elite Plus in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Observational
- [Current design and cement mantle thickness in hip arthroplasty : Theory and analysis of register data].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the survivorship of the C-Stem total hip replacement, using the "French Paradox" method, at medium-term follow-up.
methods321 cemented total hip replacements in 307 patients were performed, using the canal-filling technique for the femoral stem. Survival analysis was performed for all-cause revision. The secondary outcome was aseptic loosening of the stem.
resultsRevision rate for all reasons was 2%. Overall ten-year survival was 95%. There were no revisions for femoral stem aseptic loosening.
conclusionThis is a unique study demonstrating successful outcomes of total hip replacement using the "French Paradox" technique with a triple-tapered stem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.