ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2022
Mean Subpubic Angle of Patients Visiting Department of Radiodiagnosis of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe subpubic angle in the pelvis is most often used to estimate the sex with a higher degree of accuracy. Despite the anthropological and obstetric importance of the subpubic angle, only a few studies exist in the Nepalese population. The objective of this study was to determine the mean subpubic angle of the patient visiting the department of radiodiagnosis of tertiary care hospital.
methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study comprising 332 pelvic digital radiographs of the patients visiting the department of radiodiagnosis of a tertiary care center from March to August, 2021. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee at College of Medical Sciences (Reference number: COMSTH-IRC/2021-62). Convenience sampling method was done. Demographic data like age and sex were noted. In the radiograph, the subpubic angle was measured using the program Digimizer Image Analysis Software. The collected data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with mean and standard deviation for continuous data.
resultsAmong 332 pelvic radiographs studied, the mean subpubic angle was found to be 120.42±22.27° (118.02-122.81 at 95% Confidence Interval). The subpubic angle in females was 137.96±12.47° and that in males was 101.10±12.56°.
conclusionsOur findings are similar to those of other studies, with a minor variation. The subpubic angle was comparatively higher in females than males in the present study. The findings of this study may be of interest to forensic scientists and obstetricians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.