Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis of anterior vs posterior circulation stroke: a secondary analysis of INTRECIS.

Yu Cui, Wei-Hong Meng, Hui-Sheng Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02854592 (Intravenous Thrombolysis Registry for Chinese Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 h Onset), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02854592 completednot on this map

Intravenous Thrombolysis Registry for Chinese Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 h Onset

TypeobservationalSponsorGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionRan2017 to 2019Enrolled4,000ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsrtPA, urokinase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Argatroban plus alteplase in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu CuiDepartment of Life Science and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Rd, Shenyang, 110016, China.
Wei-Hong MengDepartment of Life Science and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Rd, Shenyang, 110016, China. meng.weihong@qq.com.
Hui-Sheng ChenDepartment of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 83 Wenhua Rd, Shenyang, 110016, China. chszh@aliyun.com.
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior circulation stroke (ACS) differs from posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in many ways, but it remains unclear whether there is any difference in early neurological deterioration (END) in two stroke territories. We compared post-thrombolytic END between ACS and PCS based on the data from INTRECIS. We screened patients receiving intravenous 0.9 mg/kg alteplase within 4.5 h in the INTRECIS cohort. According to stroke territory, patients were divided into ACS and PCS groups. The primary outcome was incidence of END, which was defined as an increase in NIHSS score ≥ 4 or death within 24 h from baseline. The secondary outcomes were associated factors of END and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution. Overall, 1194 patients were enrolled in this study: 942 in ACS group and 252 in PCS group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of END between two groups (3.8% vs 5.2%, adjusted p = 0.406). Atrial fibrillation (adjusted p = 0.012) and TOAST classification (adjusted p = 0.009) were associated with END in ACS, while hypertension history (adjusted p = 0.046) and baseline NIHSS score (adjusted p = 0.011) with END in PCS. END was associated with worse outcome on 90-day mRS in ACS and PCS (adjusted p < 0.001). Based on a prospective nationwide cohort, we provided first report for similar incidence, but different risk factors of post-thrombolytic END in ACS vs PCS patients.Trial Registration-URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02854592.

Indexed as

FibrinolysisAgedBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeThrombolytic TherapyTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID35210531
PMCPMC8873299
OpenAlexW4213424081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.