Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210490›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Automatic estimation of knee effusion from limited MRI data.

Sandhya Raman, Garry E Gold, Matthew S Rosen, Bragi Sveinsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ShapeMed-Knee: A Dataset and Neural Shape Model Benchmark for Modeling 3D Femurs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandhya RamanA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Garry E GoldDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matthew S RosenA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Bragi SveinssonA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. bsveinsson@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USStanford University · US

Funding

Rapid MRI for Evaluation of OsteoarthritisR01EB002524 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Akshay Chaudhari, Garry E Gold · 2003 to 2026
$10.1M
Advanced MR Imaging of Early OsteoarthritisK24AR062068 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E · 2012 to 2022
$1.7M
Quantitative and Spectroscopic Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Changes in Sarcopenia at High FieldK99AG066815 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SVEINSSON, BRAGI · 2021 to 2022
$229k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG066815NIH HHS K99AG066815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee effusion is a common comorbidity in osteoarthritis. To quantify the amount of effusion, semi quantitative assessment scales have been developed that classify fluid levels on an integer scale from 0 to 3. In this work, we investigated the use of a neural network (NN) that used MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scores effusion-synovitis (MOAKS-ES) values to distinguish physiologic fluid levels from higher fluid levels in MR images of the knee. We evaluate its effectiveness on low-resolution images to examine its potential in low-field, low-cost MRI. We created a dense NN (dNN) for detecting effusion, defined as a nonzero MOAKS-ES score, from MRI scans. Both the training and performance evaluation of the network were conducted using public radiological data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The model was trained using sagittal turbo-spin-echo (TSE) MR images from 1628 knees. The accuracy was compared to VGG16, a commonly used convolutional classification network. Robustness of the dNN was assessed by adding zero-mean Gaussian noise to the test images with a standard deviation of 5-30% of the maximum test data intensity. Also, inference was performed on a test data set of 163 knees, which includes a smaller test set of 36 knees that was also assessed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and the performance of the dNN and the radiologist compared. For the larger test data set, the dNN performed with an average accuracy of 62%. In addition, the network proved robust to noise, classifying the noisy images with minimal degradation to accuracy. When given MRI scans with 5% Gaussian noise, the network performed similarly, with an average accuracy of 61%. For the smaller 36-knee test data set, assessed both by the dNN and by a radiologist, the network performed better than the radiologist on average. Classifying knee effusion from low-resolution images with a similar accuracy as a human radiologist using neural networks is feasible, suggesting automatic assessment of images from low-cost, low-field scanners as a potentially useful assessment tool.

Indexed as

Exudates and TransudatesFemaleHumansKneeKnee JointMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerOsteoarthritis, KneeRadiographySynovitis

Identifiers

PMID35210490
PMCPMC8873489
OpenAlexW4213424514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.