Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Size fractionation of high-density polyethylene breakdown nanoplastics reveals different toxic response in Daphnia magna.

Mikael T Ekvall, Isabella Gimskog, Jing Hua, Egle Kelpsiene, Martin Lundqvist, Tommy Cedervall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Plastic Fly: WhatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikael T EkvallAquatic Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ecology Building, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Isabella GimskogNanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Jing HuaNanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Egle KelpsieneNanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Martin LundqvistNanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Tommy CedervallNanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden. tommy.cedervall@biochemistry.lu.se.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic litter is a growing environmental problem. Recently, microplastics and nanoplastics, produced during breakdown processes in nature, have been in focus. Although there is a growing knowledge concerning microplastic, little is still known about the effect of nanoplastics. We have showed that mechanical breakdown of high-density polyethylene (HDPE), followed by filtration through 0.8 µm filters, produces material toxic to the freshwater zooplankton Daphnia magna and affected the reproduction in life-time tests. However, further size fractionation and purification reveals that the nanoplastics fraction is non-toxic at these concentrations, whereas the fraction with smaller sizes, below ~ 3 nm, is toxic. The HDPE nanoplastics are highly oxidized and with an average diameter of 110 nm. We conclude that mechanical breakdown of HDPE may cause environmental problems, but that the fraction of leached additives and short chain HDPE are more problematic than HDPE nanoplastics.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemical FractionationDaphniaFresh WaterMicroplasticsPlasticsPolyethyleneWater Pollutants, ChemicalZooplanktonMicroplasticsPlasticsPolyethyleneWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID35210488
PMCPMC8873248
OpenAlexW4213426208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.