ArticleScientific reports2022
Cross-institutional outcome prediction for head and neck cancer patients using self-attention neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in otolaryngology: current applications, limitations, and future perspectives.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Ensemble learning approach for prediction of early complications after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer using CT and MRI radiomic features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel pre-spatial data fusion deep learning approach for multimodal volumetric outcome prediction models in radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Predicting early stage lung cancer recurrence and survival from combined tumor motion amplitude and radiomics on free-breathing 4D-CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The current landscape of artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial surgery- a narrative review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Review
- Machine learning in image-based outcome prediction after radiotherapy: A review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Review
- Deep learning and machine learning integration of radiomics and transcriptomics predicts response-adapted radiotherapy outcome and radiosensitivity in resectable locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Prognostic modeling in head and neck cancer: deep learning or handcrafted radiomics?BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Multi-Modal Ensemble Deep Learning in Head and Neck Cancer HPV Sub-Typing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Methodological evaluation of original articles on radiomics and machine learning for outcome prediction based on positron emission tomography (PET).Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- External validation of anEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Current status and future developments in predicting outcomes in radiation oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Prediction of Incomplete Response of Primary Tumour Based on Clinical and Radiomics Features in Inoperable Head and Neck Cancers after Definitive Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In radiation oncology, predicting patient risk stratification allows specialization of therapy intensification as well as selecting between systemic and regional treatments, all of which helps to improve patient outcome and quality of life. Deep learning offers an advantage over traditional radiomics for medical image processing by learning salient features from training data originating from multiple datasets. However, while their large capacity allows to combine high-level medical imaging data for outcome prediction, they lack generalization to be used across institutions. In this work, a pseudo-volumetric convolutional neural network with a deep preprocessor module and self-attention (PreSANet) is proposed for the prediction of distant metastasis, locoregional recurrence, and overall survival occurrence probabilities within the 10 year follow-up time frame for head and neck cancer patients with squamous cell carcinoma. The model is capable of processing multi-modal inputs of variable scan length, as well as integrating patient data in the prediction model. These proposed architectural features and additional modalities all serve to extract additional information from the available data when availability to additional samples is limited. This model was trained on the public Cancer Imaging Archive Head-Neck-PET-CT dataset consisting of 298 patients undergoing curative radio/chemo-radiotherapy and acquired from 4 different institutions. The model was further validated on an internal retrospective dataset with 371 patients acquired from one of the institutions in the training dataset. An extensive set of ablation experiments were performed to test the utility of the proposed model characteristics, achieving an AUROC of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for DM, LR and OS respectively on the public TCIA Head-Neck-PET-CT dataset. External validation was performed on a retrospective dataset with 371 patients, achieving [Formula: see text] AUROC in all outcomes. To test for model generalization across sites, a validation scheme consisting of single site-holdout and cross-validation combining both datasets was used. The mean accuracy across 4 institutions obtained was [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for DM, LR and OS respectively. The proposed model demonstrates an effective method for tumor outcome prediction for multi-site, multi-modal combining both volumetric data and structured patient clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.