Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index with deep learning in DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ).

Lukasz Fulawka, Jakub Blaszczyk, Martin Tabakov, Agnieszka Halon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukasz FulawkaMolecular Pathology Centre Cellgen, ul. Piwna 13, 50-353, Wroclaw, Poland. lukasz.fulawka@cellgen.pl.
Jakub BlaszczykDepartment of Computational Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370, Wrocław, Poland.
Martin TabakovDepartment of Computational Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370, Wrocław, Poland.
Agnieszka HalonDepartment of General and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation index (PI) is crucial in histopathologic diagnostics, in particular tumors. It is calculated based on Ki-67 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. PI is routinely evaluated by a visual assessment of the sample by a pathologist. However, this approach is far from ideal due to its poor intra- and interobserver variability and time-consuming. These factors force the community to seek out more precise solutions. Virtual pathology as being increasingly popular in diagnostics, armed with artificial intelligence, may potentially address this issue. The proposed solution calculates the Ki-67 proliferation index by utilizing a deep learning model and fuzzy-set interpretations for hot-spots detection. The obtained region-of-interest is then used to segment relevant cells via classical methods of image processing. The index value is approximated by relating the total surface area occupied by immunopositive cells to the total surface area of relevant cells. The achieved results are compared to the manual calculation of the Ki-67 index made by a domain expert. To increase results reliability, we trained several models in a threefold manner and compared the impact of different hyper-parameters. Our best-proposed method estimates PI with 0.024 mean absolute error, which gives a significant advantage over the current state-of-the-art solution.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell ProliferationDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35210450
PMCPMC8873444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.