Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210439›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Development and validation of a web-based prediction tool on minor physical anomalies for schizophrenia.

Xin-Yu Wang, Jin-Jia Lin, Ming-Kun Lu, Fong-Lin Jang, Huai-Hsuan Tseng, Po-See Chen, Po-Fan Chen, Wei-Hung Chang, Chih-Chun Huang, Ke-Ming Lu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xin-Yu WangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jin-Jia LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ming-Kun LuDepartment of Health, Jianan Mental Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Fong-Lin JangDepartment of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Huai-Hsuan TsengDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-1585
Po-See ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Po-Fan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wei-Hung ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Chun HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Dou-Liou Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Ke-Ming LuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hung-Pin TanDepartment of Health, Jianan Mental Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sheng-Hsiang LinInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. shlin922@mail.ncku.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-5352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In support of the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia, minor physical anomalies (MPAs) have been suggested as biomarkers and potential pathophysiological significance for schizophrenia. However, an integrated, clinically useful tool that used qualitative and quantitative MPAs to visualize and predict schizophrenia risk while characterizing the degree of importance of MPA items was lacking. We recruited a training set and a validation set, including 463 schizophrenia patients and 281 healthy controls to conduct logistic regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression to select the best parameters of MPAs and constructed nomograms. Two nomograms were built to show the weights of these predictors. In the logistic regression model, 11 out of a total of 68 parameters were identified as the best MPA items for distinguishing between patients with schizophrenia and controls, including hair whorls, epicanthus, adherent ear lobes, high palate, furrowed tongue, hyperconvex fingernails, a large gap between first and second toes, skull height, nasal width, mouth width, and palate width. The Lasso regression model included the same variables of the logistic regression model, except for nasal width, and further included two items (interpupillary distance and soft ears) to assess the risk of schizophrenia. The results of the validation dataset verified the efficacy of the nomograms with the area under the curve 0.84 and 0.85 in the logistic regression model and lasso regression model, respectively. This study provides an easy-to-use tool based on validated risk models of schizophrenia and reflects a divergence in development between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls ( https://www.szprediction.net/ ).

Identifiers

PMID35210439
PMCPMC8873231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.