Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210182›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

A systematic review of smartphone applications and devices for obstructive sleep apnea.

Peter M Baptista, Fabricio Martin, Harry Ross, Carlos O'Connor Reina, Guillermo Plaza, Manuele Casale

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905951 (The Impact Of Technology In The Myofunctional Therapy Treatment Of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06905951 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Impact Of Technology In The Myofunctional Therapy Treatment Of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Snoring, Sleep QualityArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Obstructive sleep apnea: a review for the orthodontist.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter M BaptistaClínica Universidad de Navarra, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: peterbaptista@gmail.com.
Fabricio MartinHospital de Trauma y Emergencias Dr. Federico Abete, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Malvinas Argentinas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Harry Ross3405 Penrose place, Suite 201, Boulder, CO, United States.
Carlos O'Connor ReinaHospital Quironsalud Marbella, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Marbella, Spain.
Guillermo PlazaUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos, Hospital Sanitas La Zarzuela, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Madrid, Spain.
Manuele CasaleCampus Bio-Medico University, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSleep is fundamental for both health and wellness. The advent of "on a chip" and "smartphone" technologies have created an explosion of inexpensive, at-home applications and devices specifically addressing sleep health and sleep disordered breathing. Sleep-related smartphone Applications and devices are offering diagnosis, management, and treatment of a variety of sleep disorders, mainly obstructive sleep apnea. New technology requires both a learning curve and a review of reliability. Our objective was to evaluate which app have scientific publications as well as their potential to help in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of sleep disordered breathing.

methodsWe search for relevant sleep apnea related apps on both the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store. In addition, an exhaustive literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBase, web of science and Scopus for works of apps or devices that have published in the scientific literature and have been used in a clinical setting for diagnosis or treatment of sleep disordered breathing performing a systematic review.

resultsWe found 10 smartphone apps that met the inclusion criteria.

conclusionsThe development of these apps and devices has a great future, but today are not as accurate as other traditional options. This new technology offers accessible, inexpensive, and continuous at home data monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea, but still does not count with proper testing and their validation may be unreliable.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep Apnea SyndromesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSmartphoneAppsDiagnosis of sleep apneaSleep apnea treatmentSleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID35210182
PMCPMC9801062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.