ReviewFungal biology and biotechnology2022
Risk assessment of fungal materials.
Review in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Bio-Based and Sustainable Alternatives to Conventional and Synthetic Leather.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Characterization of pure mycelium materials from different mushroom-forming fungi.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Wild Mushrooms as a Source of Bioactive Compounds and Their Antioxidant Properties-Preliminary Studies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Harnessing Fungi Signaling in Living Composites.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2024Article
- Mycelium-Based Composites: Surveying Their Acceptance by Professional Architects.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- From Nature to Design: Tailoring Pure Mycelial Materials for the Needs of Tomorrow.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Possibility of Using Sulphur Shelf Fungus (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Electrical response of fungi to changing moisture content.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Mycelium-Based Composite Materials: Study of Acceptance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fungi in Mycelium-Based Composites: Usage and Recommendations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Connecting materials sciences with fungal biology: a sea of possibilities.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Mushrooms as future generation healthy foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable fungal materials have a high potential to replace non-sustainable materials such as those used for packaging or as an alternative for leather and textile. The properties of fungal materials depend on the type of fungus and substrate, the growth conditions and post-treatment of the material. So far, fungal materials are mainly made with species from the phylum Basidiomycota, selected for the mechanical and physical properties they provide. However, for mycelium materials to be implemented in society on a large scale, selection of fungal species should also be based on a risk assessment of the potential to be pathogenic, form mycotoxins, attract insects, or become an invasive species. Moreover, production processes should be standardized to ensure reproducibility and safety of the product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.