Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35209941›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2022

Establishment of the basidiomycete Fomes fomentarius for the production of composite materials.

Carsten Pohl, Bertram Schmidt, Tamara Nunez Guitar, Sophie Klemm, Hans-Jörg Gusovius, Stefan Platzk, Harald Kruggel-Emden, Andre Klunker, Christina Völlmecke, Claudia Fleck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The complex structure ofScience advances · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carsten Pohl *Chair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3402-9595
Bertram Schmidt *Chair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-1508
Tamara Nunez GuitarChair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie KlemmChair of Materials Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2846-6120
Hans-Jörg GusoviusDepartment of Post Harvest Technology, Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-1391
Stefan PlatzkChair of Mechanical Process Engineering and Solids Processing (MVTA), Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9230-7787
Harald Kruggel-EmdenChair of Mechanical Process Engineering and Solids Processing (MVTA), Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Andre KlunkerStability and Failure of Functionally Optimized Structures Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-5492
Christina VöllmeckeStability and Failure of Functionally Optimized Structures Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4621-7400
Claudia FleckChair of Materials Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany. claudia.fleck@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-2710
Vera MeyerChair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany. vera.meyer@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2298-2258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFilamentous fungi of the phylum Basidiomycota are considered as an attractive source for the biotechnological production of composite materials. The ability of many basidiomycetes to accept residual lignocellulosic plant biomass from agriculture and forestry such as straw, shives and sawdust as substrates and to bind and glue together these otherwise loose but reinforcing substrate particles into their mycelial network, makes them ideal candidates to produce biological composites to replace petroleum-based synthetic plastics and foams in the near future.

resultsHere, we describe for the first time the application potential of the tinder fungus Fomes fomentarius for lab-scale production of mycelium composites. We used fine, medium and coarse particle fractions of hemp shives and rapeseed straw to produce a set of diverse composite materials and show that the mechanical materials properties are dependent on the nature and particle size of the substrates. Compression tests and scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize composite material properties and to model their compression behaviour by numerical simulations. Their properties were compared amongst each other and with the benchmark expanded polystyrene (EPS), a petroleum-based foam used for thermal isolation in the construction industry. Our analyses uncovered that EPS shows an elastic modulus of 2.37 ± 0.17 MPa which is 4-times higher compared to the F. fomentarius composite materials whereas the compressive strength of 0.09 ± 0.003 MPa is in the range of the fungal composite material. However, when comparing the ability to take up compressive forces at higher strain values, the fungal composites performed better than EPS. Hemp-shive based composites were able to resist a compressive force of 0.2 MPa at 50% compression, rapeseed composites 0.3 MPa but EPS only 0.15 MPa.

conclusionThe data obtained in this study suggest that F. fomentarius constitutes a promising cell factory for the future production of fungal composite materials with similar mechanical behaviour as synthetic foams such as EPS. Future work will focus on designing materials characteristics through optimizing substrate properties, cultivation conditions and by modulating growth and cell wall composition of F. fomentarius, i.e. factors that contribute on the meso- and microscale level to the composite behaviour.

Indexed as

BioeconomyCircular economyComposite materialCompressive strengthFilamentous fungiFinite element method FEMFomes fomentariusHempMechanical propertiesMyceliumNeo-Hooke modelRapeseedStiffness

Identifiers

PMID35209941
PMCPMC8876124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.