Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35209853›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Gut microbiota in pregnant Malaysian women: a comparison between trimesters, body mass index and gestational diabetes status.

Bahiyah Abdullah, Suzanna Daud, Mohd Shafiq Aazmi, Mohd Yusri Idorus, Mas Irfan Jaya Mahamooth

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bahiyah AbdullahMaternofetal and Embryo (MatE) Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. bahiyah@uitm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-8344
Suzanna DaudMaternofetal and Embryo (MatE) Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Shafiq AazmiSchool of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Mohd Yusri IdorusFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Molecular Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mas Irfan Jaya MahamoothDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hospital Sungai Buloh · MYUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

Universiti Teknologi MARA under BESTARI Research Grant 600-IRMI/DANA 5/3/BESTARI (056/2017)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary purpose of the study is to determine the variation of gut microbiota composition between first (T1) and third trimester (T3); gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non-gestational diabetes mellitus (NGDM); and also within a different category of Body Mass Index (BMI) of selected pregnant Malaysian women.

methodsA prospective observational study on selected 38 pregnant Malaysian women attending a tertiary medical centre was carried out. Those with preexisting diabetes, metabolic syndrome or any other endocrine disorders were excluded. GDM was determined using oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) while BMI was stratified as underweight, normal, pre-obese and obese. Fecal samples were then collected during the first trimester (T1) and the third trimester (T3). The V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were sequenced and analyzed using QIIME (version 1.9.1) and METAGENassist.

resultsTwelve women (31.6%) were diagnosed as GDM. A trend of lower α-diversity indices in GDM, pre-obese and obese pregnant women were observed. Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) shows a clustering of gut microbiota according to GDM status and BMI, but not by trimester. Genera Acidaminococcus, Clostridium, Megasphaera and Allisonella were higher, and Barnesiella and Blautia were lower in GDM group (P < 0.005). Obese patients had gut microbiota that was enriched with bacteria of Negativicutes and Proteobacteria class such as Megamonas, Succinatimonas and Dialister (P < 0.005). The normal and mild underweight profiles on the other hand had a higher bacteria from the class of Clostridia (Papillibacter, Oscillibacter, Oscillospira, Blautia, Dorea) and Bacteroidia (Alistipes, Prevotella, Paraprevotella) (P < 0.005).

conclusionThe prevalence and variation of several key bacteria from classes of Negativicutes, Clostridia and Proteobacteria has potential metabolic links with GDM and body weight during pregnancy which require further functional validation.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaPregnancy TrimestersAdultAnalysis of VarianceBacteriaDiabetes, GestationalDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMalaysiaPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrincipal Component AnalysisDNA, BacterialGestational diabetes mellitusGut microbiotaObesePregnancyUnderweight

Identifiers

PMID35209853
PMCPMC8876553
OpenAlexW4214691051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.