Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35209127›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Biofortification-A Frontier Novel Approach to Enrich Micronutrients in Field Crops to Encounter the Nutritional Security.

Salwinder Singh Dhaliwal, Vivek Sharma, Arvind Kumar Shukla, Vibha Verma, Manmeet Kaur, Yashbir Singh Shivay, Shahida Nisar, Ahmed Gaber, Marian Brestic, Viliam Barek and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
34.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Oxalates: Dietary Oxalates and Kidney Inflammation: A Literature Review.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Salwinder Singh DhaliwalDepartment of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-0420
Vivek SharmaDepartment of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-4265
Arvind Kumar ShuklaICA-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal 462038, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-8717
Vibha VermaDepartment of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-4173
Manmeet KaurDepartment of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Yashbir Singh ShivayDepartment of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi 110012, India.
Shahida NisarDepartment of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Ahmed GaberDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-935X
Marian BresticDepartment of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3470-6100
Viliam BarekDepartment of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-7517
Milan SkalickyDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4114-6909
Peter OndrisikDepartment of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-1823
Akbar HossainDepartment of Agronomy, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-2712
Punjab Agricultural University · INSlovak University of Agriculture in Nitra · SKBangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute · BDCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Institute of Soil Science · INTaif University · SA

Funding

This research was funded by the 'Slovak University of Agriculture,' Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2,949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic under the projects 'APVV-20-0071 APVV-20-0071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, many developing countries are facing silent epidemics of nutritional deficiencies in human beings and animals. The lack of diversity in diet, i.e., cereal-based crops deficient in mineral nutrients is an additional threat to nutritional quality. The present review accounts for the significance of biofortification as a process to enhance the productivity of crops and also an agricultural solution to address the issues of nutritional security. In this endeavor, different innovative and specific biofortification approaches have been discussed for nutrient enrichment of field crops including cereals, pulses, oilseeds and fodder crops. The agronomic approach increases the micronutrient density in crops with soil and foliar application of fertilizers including amendments. The biofortification through conventional breeding approach includes the selection of efficient genotypes, practicing crossing of plants with desirable nutritional traits without sacrificing agricultural and economic productivity. However, the transgenic/biotechnological approach involves the synthesis of transgenes for micronutrient re-translocation between tissues to enhance their bioavailability. Soil microorganisms enhance nutrient content in the rhizosphere through diverse mechanisms such as synthesis, mobilization, transformations and siderophore production which accumulate more minerals in plants. Different sources of micronutrients viz. mineral solutions, chelates and nanoparticles play a pivotal role in the process of biofortification as it regulates the absorption rates and mechanisms in plants. Apart from the quality parameters, biofortification also improved the crop yield to alleviate hidden hunger thus proving to be a sustainable and cost-effective approach. Thus, this review article conveys a message for researchers about the adequate potential of biofortification to increase crop productivity and nourish the crop with additional nutrient content to provide food security and nutritional quality to humans and livestock.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAgricultureAnimalsBiofortificationBiotechnologyCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersFood, FortifiedFood SecurityGlobal HealthGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansMalnutritionMicronutrientsMineralsNanotechnologyFertilizersMicronutrientsMineralsSoilagronomic biofortificationgene modificationgreen technologymineral dense field cropsnanotechnologytransgenic/biotechnological approach

Identifiers

PMID35209127
PMCPMC8877941
OpenAlexW4213269851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.