ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Effect of Inoculation Level on the Impact of the PGPR
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions of PGPR from the phylum bacillota with native rhizosphere microbiota: current insights and future perspectives.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbial Consortium Application Under Temperature Stress: Effects on the Rhizosphere Microbiome and Plant Growth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Proteomics, Metabolomics and Docking Analyses Provide Insights into Adaptation Strategies of Staphylococcus warneri CPD1 to Osmotic Stress and Its Influence on Wheat Growth.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Rhizosphere Growth-Promoting Bacteria Enhance Oat Growth by Improving Microbial Stability and Soil Organic Matter in the Saline Soil of the Qaidam Basin.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Inoculation of apple plantlets with Rhodococcus pseudokoreensis R79BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Rhizobacterial community and growth-promotion trait characteristics of Zea mays L. inoculated with Pseudomonas fluorescens UM270 in three different soils.Folia microbiologica · 2024Article
- Survival of a microbial inoculant in soil after recurrent inoculations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- From microbiome composition to functional engineering, one step at a time.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023Review
- Molecular Mechanisms Determining the Role of Bacteria from the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Meta-omics integration approach reveals the effect of soil native microbiome diversity in the performance of inoculantFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Impact of Plant-Beneficial Bacterial Inocula on the Resident Bacteriome: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Effects ofHeliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of inoculated plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on its host physiology and nutrition depends on inoculum level. Whether the impact of the inoculated PGPR on the indigenous rhizosphere microbiota also varies with the PGPR inoculum level is unclear. Here, we tested this issue using the PGPR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.