Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35208718›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

SARS-CoV-2 Serological and Biomolecular Analyses among Companion Animals in Campania Region (2020-2021).

Lorena Cardillo, Claudio de Martinis, Sergio Brandi, Martina Levante, Loredana Cozzolino, Luisa Spadari, Federica Boccia, Carmine Carbone, Marina Pompameo, Giovanna Fusco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena CardilloUnit of Exotic and Vector-Borne Diseases, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3050-1095
Claudio de MartinisUnit of Exotic and Vector-Borne Diseases, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-5513
Sergio BrandiUnit of Virology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Martina LevanteUnit of Exotic and Vector-Borne Diseases, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Loredana CozzolinoUnit of Exotic and Vector-Borne Diseases, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Luisa SpadariUnit of Serology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Federica BocciaUnit of Animal Health, Department of Prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL), Napoli 3 Sud, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Carmine CarboneUnit of Animal Health, Department of Prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL), Napoli 3 Sud, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Marina PompameoUnit of Animal Health "Presidio Ospedaliero Veterinario", Department of Prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL), Napoli 1 Centro, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Giovanna FuscoUnit of Virology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · ITASL Roma · IT

Funding

Ministry of Health, Italy CUP B29C20000080001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first reports of SARS-CoV-2 among domestic and wild animals, together with the rapid emergence of new variants, have created serious concerns regarding a possible spillback from animal hosts, which could accelerate the evolution of new viral strains. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among both owned and stray pets. A total of 182 dogs and 313 cats were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Specimens collected among owned and stray pets were subjected to RT-PCR and serological examinations. No viral RNA was detected, while anti-N antibodies were observed in six animals (1.3%), one dog (0.8%) and five cats (1.7%). Animals' background revealed that owned cats, living with owners with COVID-19, showed significantly different prevalence compared to stray ones (

Indexed as

catdogreal-time RT-PCRSARS-CoV-2serologysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35208718
PMCPMC8879797
OpenAlexW4210737063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.