Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35208674›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Probiotic Lactobacilli Do Not Protect Chickens against

Helena Juricova, Jitka Matiasovicova, Marcela Faldynova, Alena Sebkova, Tereza Kubasova, Hana Prikrylova, Daniela Karasova, Magdalena Crhanova, Hana Havlickova, Ivan Rychlik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Whole-genome analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena JuricovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jitka MatiasovicovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela FaldynovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Alena SebkovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tereza KubasovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana PrikrylovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Daniela KarasovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Magdalena CrhanovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana HavlickovaVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Veterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture QK1810462Ministry of Agriculture RVO0518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli are commonly used as probiotics in poultry to improve production parameters and to increase chicken resistance to enteric infections. However, lactobacilli do not efficiently colonise the chicken intestinal tract, and also, their anti-infection effect in vivo is sometimes questionable. In this study, we therefore evaluated the potential of a mixture of four

Indexed as

chickenfeed fermentationgut microbiotaLactobacillusprobioticSalmonella Enteritidis

Identifiers

PMID35208674
PMCPMC8877478
OpenAlexW4207083014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.