Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35208653›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Biocontrol of Non-

Alice Agarbati, Laura Canonico, Tania Pecci, Gianfranco Romanazzi, Maurizio Ciani, Francesca Comitini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pulcherrimin and Beyond: The Multifaceted Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Metabolomic Insights into the Antimicrobial Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biocontrol Efficacy ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Indigenous Yeasts for the Biocontrol ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Unlocking antagonistic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alice AgarbatiDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Laura CanonicoDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Tania PecciDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Gianfranco RomanazziDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0390-4008
Maurizio CianiDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-1835
Francesca ComitiniDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-2925

Funding

Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies 696295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsA combination of in vitro tests based on dual-culture methods, volatile organic compound production assay, laboratory tests on grape berries (punctured and sprayed with yeasts) and field experiments based on yeast treatments on grapes in vineyards allowed the selection of two potential BCAs.

results

conclusionsThe results indicated that the selected strains were effective BCA candidates to counteract

Indexed as

A. pullulansbioactive yeastsbiocontrolgray moldM. pulcherrima

Identifiers

PMID35208653
PMCPMC8874649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.