Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35208590›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Clinical Development of Regenerative Medicine Targeted for Intervertebral Disc Disease.

Daisuke Sakai, Jordy Schol, Masahiko Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. JOR spine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent Advances in Managing Spinal Intervertebral Discs Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Science, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4189-9270
Jordy ScholDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Science, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-2591
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Science, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-0446
Tokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain is critical health, social, and economic issue in modern societies. This disease is often associated with intervertebral disc degeneration; however, contemporary treatments are unable to target this underlying pathology to alleviate the pain symptoms. Cell therapy offers a promising novel therapeutic that, in theory, should be able to reduce low back pain through mitigating the degenerative disc environment. With the clinical development of cell therapeutics ongoing, this review aims to summarize reporting on the different clinical trials and assess the different regenerative strategies being undertaken to collectively obtain an impression on the potential safety and effectiveness of cell therapeutics against intervertebral disc-related diseases.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementHumansRegenerative Medicinecell therapyclinical trialsdegenerationintervertebral disclow back painminimally invasive surgeryregenerationspinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID35208590
PMCPMC8878570
OpenAlexW4211257160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.