ArticleMicromachines2022
Protein Dielectrophoresis: A Tale of Two Clausius-Mossottis-Or Something Else?
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-resolution 3D-printed insulator-based dielectrophoresis devices for biomolecular manipulation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A 3D-printed microdevice for dielectrophoretic torque-driven rotation of dielectric microspheres to support development of manipulation systems for zebrafish eggs.Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems · 2025Article
- The Multi-Conductivity Clausius-Mossotti Factor as an Electrophysiology Rosetta Stone: Dielectrophoresis, Membrane Potential and Zeta Potential.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Collection of serum albumin aggregate nanoparticles from human plasma by dielectrophoresis.Electrophoresis · 2024Article
- Visual and Quantitative Analysis of the Trapping Volume in Dielectrophoresis of Nanoparticles.Nano letters · 2024Article
- Charged Biological Membranes Repel Large Neutral Molecules by Surface Dielectrophoresis and Counterion Pressure.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Trajectories and Forces in Four-Electrode Chambers Operated in Object-Shift, Dielectrophoresis and Field-Cage Modes-Considerations from the System's Point of View.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Micromachines for Dielectrophoresis, Volume II.Micromachines · 2023Article
- The System's Point of View Applied to Dielectrophoresis in Plate Capacitor and Pointed-versus-Pointed Electrode Chambers.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Novel Sensing Technique for Stem Cells Differentiation Using Dielectric Spectroscopy of Their Proteins.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Dielectrophoresis: An Approach to Increase Sensitivity, Reduce Response Time and to Suppress Nonspecific Binding in Biosensors?Biosensors · 2022Review
- Protein Albumin Manipulation and Electrical Quantification of Molecular Dielectrophoresis Responses for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard DEP theory, based on the Clausius-Mossotti (CM) factor derived from solving the boundary-value problem of macroscopic electrostatics, fails to describe the dielectrophoresis (DEP) data obtained for 22 different globular proteins over the past three decades. The calculated DEP force appears far too small to overcome the dispersive forces associated with Brownian motion. An empirical theory, employing the equivalent of a molecular version of the macroscopic CM-factor, predicts a protein's DEP response from the magnitude of the dielectric
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.