ArticleMicromachines2022
Multi-Modal Microfluidics (M
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced YOLOv5 network-based object detection (BALFilter Reader) promotes PERFECT filter-enabled liquid biopsy of lung cancer from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsy, the technique used to shed light on diseases via liquid samples, has displayed various advantages, including minimal invasiveness, low risk, and ease of multiple sampling for dynamic monitoring, and has drawn extensive attention from multidisciplinary fields in the past decade. With the rapid development of microfluidics, it has been possible to manipulate targets of interest including cells, microorganisms, and exosomes at a single number level, which dramatically promotes the characterization and analysis of disease-related markers, and thus improves the capability of liquid biopsy. However, when lab-ready techniques transfer into hospital-applicable tools, they still face a big challenge in processing raw clinical specimens, which are usually of a large volume and consist of rare targets drowned in complex backgrounds. Efforts toward the sample preparation of clinical specimens (i.e., recovering/concentrating the rare targets among complex backgrounds from large-volume liquids) are required to bridge the gap between the proof-of-concept demonstrations and practical applications. The throughput, sensitivity, and purity (TSP performance criteria) in sample preparation, i.e., the volume speed in processing liquid samples and the efficiencies of recovering rare targets and depleting the backgrounds, are three key factors requiring careful consideration when implementing microfluidic-based liquid biopsy for clinical practices. Platforms based on a single microfluidic module (single-modal microfluidics) can hardly fulfill all the aforementioned TSP performance criteria in clinical practices, which puts forward an urgent need to combine/couple multiple microfluidic modules into one working system (i.e., multi-modal microfluidics, M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.