ReviewMicromachines2022
A Review of Microfluidic Devices for Rheological Characterisation.
Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Microfluidic Method for Simultaneous Assessment of Blood Viscosity and Red Blood Cell Aggregation During Continuous Syringe Delivery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emergent Interpolymer Interactions in Flowing Polymer Solutions.ACS macro letters · 2026Article
- Micro Blood Flow-Resolved Rheometry.Micromachines · 2026Article
- A Microfluidic Platform for Viscosity Testing of Non-Newtonian Fluids in Engineering and Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Multiphysics optomechanical sensing of a liquid on the micron scale.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- i-Rheo-Indent: Broadband rheological characterisation of soft solids by macroscale indentation.Rheologica acta · 2026Article
- A review of research methods for elucidating the microstructure of pharmaceutical preparations.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Computational Analysis of Flow and Transport Suggests Reduced Oxygen Levels Within Intracranial Aneurysms, Especially in Individuals With Sickle-Cell Disease.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025Article
- The Impact of Targeted Therapies on Red Blood Cell Aggregation in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Evaluated Using Software Image Flow Analysis.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Periodic Flows in Microfluidics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Embedded 3D Printing for Microchannel Fabrication in Epoxy-Based Microfluidic Devices.Polymers · 2024Article
- Investigation of the Effect of High Shear Stress on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using a Rotational Rheometer in a Small-Angle Cone-Plate Configuration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Portable Microfluidic Viscometer for Formulation Development and in Situ Quality Control of Protein and Antibody Solutions.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- A Visual, In-Expensive, and Wireless Capillary Rheometer for Characterizing Wholly-Cellular Bioinks.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Optimizing Sensitivity in a Fluid-Structure Interaction-Based Microfluidic Viscometer: A Multiphysics Simulation Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of Non-Newtonian Viscosity on Flow Structures and Wall Deformation in Compliant Serpentine Microchannels: A Numerical Study.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Microsystem Advances through Integration with Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Quantification of Blood Viscoelasticity under Microcapillary Blood Flow.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Microfluidic techniques for mechanical measurements of biological samples.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Biosensing of Haemorheological Properties Using Microblood Flow Manipulation and Quantification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The rheological characterisation of liquids finds application in several fields ranging from industrial production to the medical practice. Conventional rheometers are the gold standard for the rheological characterisation; however, they are affected by several limitations, including high costs, large volumes required and difficult integration to other systems. By contrast, microfluidic devices emerged as inexpensive platforms, requiring a little sample to operate and fashioning a very easy integration into other systems. Such advantages have prompted the development of microfluidic devices to measure rheological properties such as viscosity and longest relaxation time, using a finger-prick of volumes. This review highlights some of the microfluidic platforms introduced so far, describing their advantages and limitations, while also offering some prospective for future works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.