ArticleMicromachines2022
Particle Focusing in a Straight Microchannel with Non-Rectangular Cross-Section.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inertial Microfluidic Separation of Cell Clusters from Blood Cells in Meandering Channels.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Microparticle Focusing and Separation in Split-Recombination Microchannel.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Viscoelastic particle focusing and separation in a microfluidic channel with a cruciform section.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Sheathless inertial particle focusing methods within microfluidic devices: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, studies on particle behavior under Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in microchannel have attracted considerable attention because particles and cells of interest can be manipulated and separated from biological samples without any external force. In this paper, two kinds of microchannels with non-rectangular cross-section were fabricated using basic MEMS processes (photolithography, reactive ion etching and anisotropy wet etching), plasma bonding and self-alignment between two PDMS structures. They were used to achieve the experiments for inertial and elasto-inertial particle focusing under Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. The particle behavior was compared and investigated for different flow rates and particle size in the microchannel with rhombic and equilateral hexagonal cross section. We also investigated the influence of Newtonian fluid and viscoelastic fluid on particle migration in both microchannels through the numerical simulation. The experimental results showed the multi-line particle focusing in Newtonian fluid over a wide range of flow rates, but the single-line particle focusing was formed in the centerline under non-Newtonian fluid. The tighter particle focusing appeared under non-Newtonian fluid in the microchannel with equilateral hexagonal cross-section than in the microchannel with rhombic cross section because of the effect of an obtuse angle. It revealed that particles suspended in the channel are likely to drift toward a channel center due to a negative net elasto-inertial force throughout the cross-sectional area. Simulation results support the present experimental observation that the viscoelastic fluid in the microchannel with rhombic and equilateral hexagonal cross-section significantly influences on the particle migration toward the channel center owing to coupled effect of inertia and elasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.