Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35208143›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Study on Biodegradation of Pure Iron Prepared by Microwave Sintering and Laser Melting.

Yingchao Zhao, Jun Feng, Hui Yu, Wangyang Lin, Xin Li, Yan Tian, Mingchun Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingchao ZhaoCollege of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Jun FengCollege of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Hui YuCollege of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Wangyang LinCollege of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9891-4692
Xin LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Yan TianSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Mingchun ZhaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-7188
University of South China · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

the PhD Scientific Research Start-up Fund of University of South China No.200XQD073the PhD Scientific Research Start-up Fund of University of South China No.200XQD082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For biodegradable pure iron implants, a higher biodegradation rate is preferred. In this work, we compared the biodegradation of pure iron prepared by microwave sintering and laser melting (designated as MSed Fe and LMed Fe, respectively). The MSed Fe presented a distinct porous structure, while the LMed Fe presented a relatively compact structure without any obvious pores. The biodegradation rate of the MSed Fe was higher than that of the LMed Fe, and their biodegradation rates were higher than that of the as-cast Fe. The biodegradation rates of the MSed Fe and the LMed Fe were approximately 44 and 13 times higher than that of the as cast Fe, respectively. The biodegradation was closely related to the microstructure's compactness and grain size. Moreover, the MSed Fe and the LMed Fe had satisfactory biocompatibility.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybiodegradationlaser meltingmicrowave sinteringpure iron

Identifiers

PMID35208143
PMCPMC8879248
OpenAlexW4213020801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.