Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207796›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Enhancement of COVID-19 CT Image Segmentation.

Hanane Allioui, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Narjes Benameur, Belal Al-Khateeb, Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain, Robertas Damaševičius, Rytis Maskeliūnas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RADIC:A tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Event-Specific Transmission Forecasting of SARS-CoV-2 in a Mixed-Mode Ventilated Office Room Using an ANN.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A novel deep fusion strategy for COVID-19 prediction using multimodality approach.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hanane AlliouiComputer Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-6208-3102
Mazin Abed MohammedComputer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-9030-8102
Narjes BenameurLaboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technology, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1006, Tunisia.
Belal Al-KhateebComputer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-3066-0790
Karrar Hameed AbdulkareemCollege of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-2049
Begonya Garcia-ZapiraineVIDA Laboratory, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-1186
Robertas DamaševičiusFaculty of Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-9990-1084
Rytis MaskeliūnasFaculty of Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-2809-2213
Kaunas University of Technology · LTUniversity of Anbar · IQAl-Muthanna University · IQCadi Ayyad University · MATunis University · TNUniversidad de Deusto · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, most mask extraction techniques are based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, there are still numerous problems that mask extraction techniques need to solve. Thus, the most advanced methods to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are necessary. The use of cooperative agents in mask extraction increases the efficiency of automatic image segmentation. Hence, we introduce a new mask extraction method that is based on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to minimize the long-term manual mask extraction and to enhance medical image segmentation frameworks. A DRL-based method is introduced to deal with mask extraction issues. This new method utilizes a modified version of the Deep Q-Network to enable the mask detector to select masks from the image studied. Based on COVID-19 computed tomography (CT) images, we used DRL mask extraction-based techniques to extract visual features of COVID-19 infected areas and provide an accurate clinical diagnosis while optimizing the pathogenic diagnostic test and saving time. We collected CT images of different cases (normal chest CT, pneumonia, typical viral cases, and cases of COVID-19). Experimental validation achieved a precision of 97.12% with a Dice of 80.81%, a sensitivity of 79.97%, a specificity of 99.48%, a precision of 85.21%, an F1 score of 83.01%, a structural metric of 84.38%, and a mean absolute error of 0.86%. Additionally, the results of the visual segmentation clearly reflected the ground truth. The results reveal the proof of principle for using DRL to extract CT masks for an effective diagnosis of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 segmentationCT imagemask extractionmulti-agent reinforcement learningsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID35207796
PMCPMC8880720
OpenAlexW4214712602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.