Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35207763›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis.

Ahmad Naeem, Tayyaba Anees, Rizwan Ali Naqvi, Woong-Kee Loh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad NaeemDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9705-386X
Tayyaba AneesDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-9322
Rizwan Ali NaqviDepartment of Unmanned Vehicle Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-8441
Woong-Kee LohSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea.
University of Management and Technology · PKGachon University · KRSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are a deadly disease with a high mortality rate. Early diagnosis of brain tumors improves treatment, which results in a better survival rate for patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently emerged as an assistive technology for the early diagnosis of tumors, and AI is the primary focus of researchers in the diagnosis of brain tumors. This study provides an overview of recent research on the diagnosis of brain tumors using federated and deep learning methods. The primary objective is to explore the performance of deep and federated learning methods and evaluate their accuracy in the diagnosis process. A systematic literature review is provided, discussing the open issues and challenges, which are likely to guide future researchers working in the field of brain tumor diagnosis.

Indexed as

brain tumordeep learningfederated learninghealth caremagnetic resonance imagingtumor detectiontumor diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35207763
PMCPMC8880689
OpenAlexW4212858816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.